Another neo con
What teh fuck?Remember Al Qaeda? They were the enemy, right? On account of knocking down the WTC and all that. We're clear that they are who is not "with us" when we said "you're either with us or against us.
So what is this?:
Elements of the tough new approach towards Tehran outlined by Hersh include:
· Clandestine operations against Iran and Syria, as well as the Hizbullah movement in Lebanon - even to the extent of bolstering Sunni extremist groups that are sympathetic to al-Qaida
When the US attacked Afghanistan, Iran helped. They were our friends then. They were quite aggrieved when we started treating them like shit straight afterwards. After all, they're about on a par for demented Islamness with Pakistan and several streets behind Saudi Arabia (which is involved in this plot to provoke Iran into war).
So it seems it's "you're either with us or against us unless you're against whoever's against us and then you're with us even if you're against us".
All those who still believe that neocon idealism is "not misguided" raise your hands.
posted by Dr Zen @ 11:53 am
1 Comments:
Officially not raising my hand (without respect to the theories that may have been current before the gift of 9-11).
Post a Comment
<< Home