More design stuff
An interesting and complete refutation from Prof Matt Young of Dembski's claim that "specified complexity" implies design. A little bit less heated than Matt Brauer's slamming of Dembski on Panda's Thumb.
What amused me most of all was Young's cheeky suggestion that Dembski might have made it all up to get himself a name. He certainly gets a lot of heat with very little light.
The most hilarious comment, though, just has to be in Kornbelt's review of Dembski's No Free Lunch: "If there is a Designer, of course, He/She/It/They would necessraily be in the "gaps." Where else would He/She/It/They be? "
Erm.
posted by Dr Zen @ 1:40 am
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home